Caracul Fur Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Caracul Fur Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 338

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 28, 1957

DocketNo. 60965; protests 852509-G, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 338 (Caracul Fur Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caracul Fur Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 338 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

Opinions

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 Cust. Ct. 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caracul-fur-co-v-united-states-cusc-1957.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack