Carabella v. State

727 So. 2d 270, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 845, 1999 WL 44443
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 3, 1999
DocketNo. 98-0427
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 727 So. 2d 270 (Carabella v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carabella v. State, 727 So. 2d 270, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 845, 1999 WL 44443 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant argues that the trial court erroneously excluded certain testimony upon the state’s hearsay objection. By not raising in the trial court those arguments for admissibility now raised on appeal, appellant failed to preserve his contention that the excluded statements were non-hearsay or that they fell within some exception to the hearsay rule. See Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985); Guittierez v. State, 704 So.2d 161 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (Gross, J., concurring).

DELL, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tiffany Staesche v. Estate of Elliott Joe Housley
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Medina v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Hay v. Hay
944 So. 2d 1043 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
727 So. 2d 270, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 845, 1999 WL 44443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carabella-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.