Carabell v. US Army Corps Engr

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 12, 2007·No. 03-1700·Unpublished

Opinion

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 07a0116n.06 Filed: February 12, 2007

Case No. 03-1700

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

JUNE CARABELL, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ) ORDER REMANDING CASE v. ) TO THE DISTRICT COURT ) WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ) REMAND TO THE ARMY ENGINEERS, et al. ) CORPS OF ENGINEERS ) Defendants-Appellees. ) ) _______________________________________ ) )

BEFORE: BATCHELDER and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; STAFFORD*, District Judge.

Following the Supreme Court’s decision in the consolidated cases of Rapanos v. United

States, No. 04-1034, and Carabell v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, No. 04-1384, 126 S.

Ct. 2208 (2006), we REMAND this case to the district court with instructions to remand to the Army

Corps of Engineers for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in

Rapanos.

* The Honorable William Stafford, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carabell v. US Army Corps Engr, (6th Cir. 2007).

Carabell v. US Army Corps Engr (Carabell v. US Army Corps Engr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rapanos v. United States
547 U.S. 715 (Supreme Court, 2006)