Car-Lynn Realty Corp. v. Almar Properties, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Car-Lynn Realty Corp. v. Almar Properties, Inc.

26 A.D.2d 570, 271 N.Y.S.2d 615, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3941

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 570 (Car-Lynn Realty Corp. v. Almar Properties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Car-Lynn Realty Corp. v. Almar Properties, Inc., 26 A.D.2d 570, 271 N.Y.S.2d 615, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a real estate broker to recover for services rendered under a brokerage contract and for damages sustained as a result of a conspiracy to induce a breach of the contract, all the defendants except Almar Properties, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered January 13, 1966, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint as against them for failure to state a cause of action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The time for appellants to answer the complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. The complaint sufficiently sets forth a cause of action in conspiracy to induce a breach of the brokerage contract (Hornstein v. Podwitz, 254 N. Y. 443; Keviczky v. Lorber, 290 N. Y. .297). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a real estate broker to recover for services rendered under a brokerage contract and for damages sustained as a result of a conspiracy to induce a breach of the contract, all the defendants except Almar Properties, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered January 13, 1966, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint as against them for failure to state a cause of action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The time for appellants to answer the complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. The complaint sufficiently sets forth a cause of action in conspiracy to induce a breach of the brokerage contract (Hornstein v. Podwitz, 254 N. Y. 443; Keviczky v. Lorber, 290 N. Y. .297). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 570, 271 N.Y.S.2d 615, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/car-lynn-realty-corp-v-almar-properties-inc-nyappdiv-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack