Caputo v. Webb

139 A.D.2d 735, 527 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4504
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 25, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 139 A.D.2d 735 (Caputo v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caputo v. Webb, 139 A.D.2d 735, 527 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4504 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities dated July 24, 1985, which sustained a determination of a Hearing Officer which transferred a handicapped individual from one community residential facility to another on the ground that a transfer was in her best interest.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner is the father of a mentally retarded and blind woman who for 11 years had resided at an intermediate care facility owned and operated by the Association for the Advancement of Blind and Retarded, Inc. (hereinafter AABR). When, pursuant to new interpretation of Federal regulations, the client, Susan, could not be certified as self-preserving, a transfer to a new facility was mandated (14 NYCRR 686.2 [c] [4] [vi]). This move was opposed by the petitioner. It is clear, however, that the evidence adduced at the hearing justified the Hearing Officer’s decision, as sustained by the respondent, that the move to the new facility was in Susan’s best interest. In addition to being a suitable place for non-self-preserving individuals, the new facility offers equivalent or greater care to the client and hence the transfer is clearly in her best interest. As this determination is supported by substantial evidence (CPLR 7803 [4]) it should not be disturbed (see, Matter of Schorr v Weinberg, 129 AD2d 645, 646).

[736]*736We have examined the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Kunzeman, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughes v. Maul
221 A.D.2d 1022 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 A.D.2d 735, 527 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caputo-v-webb-nyappdiv-1988.