Caputo v. Weaver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Caputo v. Weaver

10 A.D.2d 949, 201 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10351

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 2, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 949 (Caputo v. Weaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caputo v. Weaver, 10 A.D.2d 949, 201 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review a determination of the respondent, State Rent Administrator, overruling a landlord’s protest to an order of the Local Rent Administrator holding that the subject housing accommodation was not eligible for decontrol under subdivision 12 of section 9 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations, on the ground that it was being utilized as a three-family dwelling, petitioner, the landlord, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered April 3, 1959, denying his petition and dismissing the proceeding. Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review a determination of the respondent, State Rent Administrator, overruling a landlord’s protest to an order of the Local Rent Administrator holding that the subject housing accommodation was not eligible for decontrol under subdivision 12 of section 9 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations, on the ground that it was being utilized as a three-family dwelling, petitioner, the landlord, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered April 3, 1959, denying his petition and dismissing the proceeding. Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 949, 201 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caputo-v-weaver-nyappdiv-1960.