Caputo v. Thompson

247 A.D. 890

Opinion

Motion for reargument granted, without costs. [See ante, p. 797.] Present ■—■ Lazansky, P. J., Young, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ. Upon reargument, the order of the City Court of White Plains setting aside the verdict rendered in plaintiff’s favor is modified so as to provide for a new trial. As so modified the order is unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents. The court, upon setting aside the verdict, should have granted a new trial; and the omission may be supplied by this court. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 105.) Present — Young, Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caputo v. Thompson, 247 A.D. 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

247 A.D. 890 (Caputo v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.