Capurso v. Dibling
This text of 531 So. 2d 364 (Capurso v. Dibling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the entry of a summary judgment for the appellees. The complaint contains sufficient allegations to state a claim for gross negligence under the immunity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law, Section 440.11(1), Florida Statutes (1987). See Streeter v. Sullivan, 509 So.2d 268 (Fla.1987). Additionally, the motion for summary judgment was directed solely at the pleadings — therefore the plaintiff was not required to rebut matters of evidence not raised by the defendant. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c).
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
531 So. 2d 364, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2083, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3984, 1988 WL 91222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capurso-v-dibling-fladistctapp-1988.