Capurso v. Dibling

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Capurso v. Dibling

531 So. 2d 364, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2083, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3984, 1988 WL 91222

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 7, 1988·No. No. 87-1480·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the entry of a summary judgment for the appellees. The complaint contains sufficient allegations to state a claim for gross negligence under the immunity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law, Section 440.11(1), Florida Statutes (1987). See Streeter v. Sullivan, 509 So.2d 268 (Fla.1987). Additionally, the motion for summary judgment was directed solely at the pleadings — therefore the plaintiff was not required to rebut matters of evidence not raised by the defendant. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., and TOBIN, DAVID L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the entry of a summary judgment for the appellees. The complaint contains sufficient allegations to state a claim for gross negligence under the immunity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law, Section 440.11(1), Florida Statutes (1987). See Streeter v. Sullivan, 509 So.2d 268 (Fla.1987). Additionally, the motion for summary judgment was directed solely at the pleadings — therefore the plaintiff was not required to rebut matters of evidence not raised by the defendant. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., and TOBIN, DAVID L., Associate Judge, concur.

Capurso v. Dibling, 531 So. 2d 364, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2083, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3984, 1988 WL 91222 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

531 So. 2d 364 (Capurso v. Dibling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related