Captain Jack
This text of 130 U.S. 353 (Captain Jack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.-
The only distinctions between this case and that of Gonshay-ee, in which the opinion has just been delivered, are:
First. That Captain Jack was sentenced to imprisonment at hard labor in the penitentiary of Ohio for thirty years, and the writ must, therefore, be directed to the keeper of that institution at Columbus in that State.
Second. That it appears by the record that in the former case the offence was committed on an Indian reservation, while in the case of Captain Jack the act was done within the judicial district, but not upon such a reservation.
"We do not consider that these differences have any influence in the decision of the question as to the jurisdiction of the court which tried them both, and that therefore in this case, as in the former, the writ of habeas corpus should issue.
Writ grcmted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 U.S. 353, 9 S. Ct. 546, 32 L. Ed. 976, 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/captain-jack-scotus-1889.