Caprie v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Caprie v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

419 So. 2d 1163, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21341

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 1982·No. No. AN-142·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted. See Britt v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 417 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Overfield v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); and Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Appellant's contention that he relied upon representations made to him during plea negotiations, concerning his parole release date, does not relate to ex post facto application of the Florida Parole and Probation Commission’s rules, but to the validity of his guilty plea. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

MILLS, ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted. See Britt v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 417 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Overfield v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); and Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Appellant's contention that he relied upon representations made to him during plea negotiations, concerning his parole release date, does not relate to ex post facto application of the Florida Parole and Probation Commission’s rules, but to the validity of his guilty plea. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

MILLS, ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Caprie v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 419 So. 2d 1163, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21341 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

419 So. 2d 1163 (Caprie v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related