Caprie v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
This text of 419 So. 2d 1163 (Caprie v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted. See Britt v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 417 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Overfield v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); and Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Appellant's contention that he relied upon representations made to him during plea negotiations, concerning his parole release date, does not relate to ex post facto application of the Florida Parole and Probation Commission’s rules, but to the validity of his guilty plea. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
419 So. 2d 1163, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caprie-v-florida-parole-probation-commission-fladistctapp-1982.