Capricorn Marble Co. v. George Hyman Construction Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Capricorn Marble Co. v. George Hyman Construction Co.

462 So. 2d 1208, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 311, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12300

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 6, 1985

DocketNo. 84-142

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 462 So. 2d 1208 (Capricorn Marble Co. v. George Hyman Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Capricorn Marble Co. v. George Hyman Construction Co., 462 So. 2d 1208, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 311, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12300 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We do not have jurisdiction over this appeal of a non-final order as it is not authorized under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130, or otherwise.

Further, it does not qualify for cer-tiorari treatment as it does not appear that there has been a departure from the essential requirements of law or that appellant will not have a full and adequate remedy by plenary appeal.

While perhaps tempted to address the merits, we cannot do so because it is a fundamental principle of law that if a court is without jurisdiction, it has no power to adjudicate or determine any issue or cause submitted to it. See 13 Fla.Jur.2d, Courts and Judges, §§ 22-31.

Appeal dismissed.

LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI