Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Capri v. Power

Capri v. Power

228 A.D.2d 461, 644 N.Y.2d 292, 644 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6614
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 10, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 228 A.D.2d 461 (Capri v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Capri v. Power, 228 A.D.2d 461, 644 N.Y.2d 292, 644 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6614 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

[462]*462The proposed amended second cause of action, insofar as asserted against the appellants, is patently lacking in merit. Consequently, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint as against the appellants (see, Kaplansky v Kaplansky, 212 AD2d 667; Del Bourgo v 138 Sidelines Corp., 208 AD2d 795). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

110 Sand Co. v. Nassau Land Improvement Co.
233 A.D.2d 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 461, 644 N.Y.2d 292, 644 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capri-v-power-nyappdiv-1996.