Capps v. Kem

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Capps v. Kem

564 So. 2d 259, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5257, 1990 WL 102733

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 23, 1990

DocketNo. 90-1037

StatusPublished

This text of 564 So. 2d 259 (Capps v. Kem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Capps v. Kem, 564 So. 2d 259, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5257, 1990 WL 102733 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We issued a show cause order on the petition for review, by certiorari, filed by defendants in a personal injury action. Upon further consideration of the petition, the response, and petitioners’ reply, we conclude that the trial court’s interlocutory order sustaining respondents’ objection to petitioners’ request for examination under Rule 1.360, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, neither departed from the essential requirements of law, nor amounted to a material injury for which an appellate remedy would be inadequate. See Pregony v. Custer, 558 So.2d 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) and Martin-Johnson v. Savage, 509 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1987). Consequently, upon jurisdictional grounds, the petition for certiorari is denied. Esman v. Board of Regents, 425 So.2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

JOANOS, WIGGINTON and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We issued a show cause order on the petition for review, by certiorari, filed by defendants in a personal injury action. Upon further consideration of the petition, the response, and petitioners’ reply, we conclude that the trial court’s interlocutory order sustaining respondents’ objection to petitioners’ request for examination under Rule 1.360, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, neither departed from the essential requirements of law, nor amounted to a material injury for which an appellate remedy would be inadequate. See Pregony v. Custer, 558 So.2d 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) and Martin-Johnson v. Savage, 509 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1987). Consequently, upon jurisdictional grounds, the petition for certiorari is denied. Esman v. Board of Regents, 425 So.2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

JOANOS, WIGGINTON and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 So. 2d 259, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5257, 1990 WL 102733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capps-v-kem-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack