Capps v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

Court of Appeals of Texas

Capps v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

252 S.W.3d 426, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 3810, 2006 WL 1224572

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 4, 2006

Docket01-05-01090-CV

StatusPublished

This text of 252 S.W.3d 426 (Capps v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Capps v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, 252 S.W.3d 426, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 3810, 2006 WL 1224572 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Damon R. Capps has neither established indigence, nor paid all the required fees. See Tex.R.Ajpp. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (fisting requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (Vernon Supp.2005) (fisting fees in court of appeals); Fees Civ. Cases B(l), (3) (fisting fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant Damon R. Capps did not adequately respond. See Tex.R.App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

The appeal is dismissed for nonpayment of all required fees. All pending motions are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Damon R. Capps has neither established indigence, nor paid all the required fees. See Tex.R.Ajpp. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (fisting requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (Vernon Supp.2005) (fisting fees in court of appeals); Fees Civ. Cases B(l), (3) (fisting fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant Damon R. Capps did not adequately respond. See Tex.R.App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

The appeal is dismissed for nonpayment of all required fees. All pending motions are denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 S.W.3d 426, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 3810, 2006 WL 1224572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capps-v-commission-for-lawyer-discipline-texapp-2006.