Capps v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

252 S.W.3d 426, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 3810, 2006 WL 1224572
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 4, 2006·No. 01-05-01090-CV·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Damon R. Capps has neither established indigence, nor paid all the required fees. See Tex.R.Ajpp. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (fisting requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (Vernon Supp.2005) (fisting fees in court of appeals); Fees Civ. Cases B(l), (3) (fisting fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant Damon R. Capps did not adequately respond. See Tex.R.App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

The appeal is dismissed for nonpayment of all required fees. All pending motions are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Capps v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, 252 S.W.3d 426, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 3810, 2006 WL 1224572 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

252 S.W.3d 426 (Capps v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.