Capps v. Atiyeh
This text of 652 F.2d 823 (Capps v. Atiyeh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case is ordered submitted. The district court’s judgment is vacated. See Capps v. Atiyeh, 495 F.Supp. 802 (D.Ore. 1980), stayed, Atiyeh v. Capps, 449 U.S. 1312, 101 S.Ct. 829, 66 L.Ed.2d 785 (Rehnquist, Circuit Justice, 1981). The case is remanded for further consideration and specific findings in light of Rhodes v. Chapman, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981) and Wright v. Rushen, 642 F.2d 1129 (9th Cir. 1981).
Appellants’ motion to submit supplemental briefs is denied.
JUDGMENT VACATED and CASE REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
652 F.2d 823, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 10868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capps-v-atiyeh-ca9-1981.