Capps v. Atiyeh

652 F.2d 823, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 10868
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 3, 1981·No. No. 80-3404·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The case is ordered submitted. The district court’s judgment is vacated. See Capps v. Atiyeh, 495 F.Supp. 802 (D.Ore. 1980), stayed, Atiyeh v. Capps, 449 U.S. 1312, 101 S.Ct. 829, 66 L.Ed.2d 785 (Rehnquist, Circuit Justice, 1981). The case is remanded for further consideration and specific findings in light of Rhodes v. Chapman, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981) and Wright v. Rushen, 642 F.2d 1129 (9th Cir. 1981).

Appellants’ motion to submit supplemental briefs is denied.

JUDGMENT VACATED and CASE REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Capps v. Atiyeh, 652 F.2d 823, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 10868 (9th Cir. 1981).

652 F.2d 823 (Capps v. Atiyeh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ATIYEH, GOVERNOR OF OREGON, Et Al. v. CAPPS Et Al.
449 U.S. 1312 (Supreme Court, 1981)
Rhodes v. Chapman
452 U.S. 337 (Supreme Court, 1981)
James C. Wright v. Ruth Rushen
642 F.2d 1129 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
Capps v. Atiyeh
495 F. Supp. 802 (D. Oregon, 1980)