Cappello v. Flea Market U.S.A., Inc.

625 So. 2d 474, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11123
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 1993·No. No. 92-2590·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of final summary judgment in favor of Flea Market U.S.A., Inc. Cappello’s affidavit in opposition to the motion for summary judgment failed to meet the requirements of Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(e), as it was not made upon personal knowledge, and did not set forth facts that would be admissible in evidence. The affidavit was based on inadmissible hearsay statements, and was not competent to defeat a motion for summary judgment. Doss v. Steger & Steger P.A., 613 So.2d 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Mullan v. Bishop of Diocese of Orlando, 540 So.2d 174 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Crosby v. Paxson Elec. Co., 534 So.2d 787 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Page v. Staley, 226 So.2d 129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cappello v. Flea Market U.S.A., Inc., 625 So. 2d 474, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11123 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

625 So. 2d 474 (Cappello v. Flea Market U.S.A., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brunette v. Glendale Federal Bank
632 So. 2d 1150 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)