Cappe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cappe v. State

656 So. 2d 222, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5778, 1995 WL 322554

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 31, 1995

DocketNo. 94-999

StatusPublished

This text of 656 So. 2d 222 (Cappe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cappe v. State, 656 So. 2d 222, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5778, 1995 WL 322554 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rolando Cappe appeals his convictions for first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit first-degree murder, shooting into a vehicle, and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. We conclude that the evidence was legally sufficient and that no evidentiary error was committed. See De Pena v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly D901, 652 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 12, 1995). We find no merit in the claim of jury selec[223]*223tion error and the claim of improper closing argument.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rolando Cappe appeals his convictions for first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit first-degree murder, shooting into a vehicle, and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. We conclude that the evidence was legally sufficient and that no evidentiary error was committed. See De Pena v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly D901, 652 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 12, 1995). We find no merit in the claim of jury selec[223]*223tion error and the claim of improper closing argument.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

656 So. 2d 222, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5778, 1995 WL 322554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cappe-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack