Cappe v. State
656 So. 2d 222, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5778, 1995 WL 322554
Opinion
Rolando Cappe appeals his convictions for first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit first-degree murder, shooting into a vehicle, and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. We conclude that the evidence was legally sufficient and that no evidentiary error was committed. See De Pena v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly D901, 652 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 12, 1995). We find no merit in the claim of jury selec[223]*223tion error and the claim of improper closing argument.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cappe v. State, 656 So. 2d 222, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5778, 1995 WL 322554 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
656 So. 2d 222 (Cappe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
De Pena v. State
652 So. 2d 1273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)