Cappadora v. Orange-Ulster BOCES

72 A.D.3d 862, 898 N.Y.S.2d 863

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated April 3, 2009, which granted the separate motions of the defendant Orange-Ulster BOCES, and the defendant Joint Recreation Commission of the Town and Village of Goshen, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of their separate motions for summary judgment, the defendants Orange-Ulster BOCES and Joint Recreation Commission of the Town and Village of Goshen made prima facie showings of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that, pursuant to the doctrine of primary assumption of risk, they owed no duty to the plaintiff (see Maddox v City of New York, 66 NY2d 270, 274-275 [1985]; Lombardo v Cedar Brook Golf & Tennis Club, Inc., 39 AD3d 818, 819 [2007]; Joseph v New York Racing Assn., 28 AD3d 105, 108-109 [2006]; Barboto v Hollow Hills Country Club, 14 AD3d 522 [2005]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Rivera, J.P., Angiolillo, Dickerson and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cappadora v. Orange-Ulster BOCES, 72 A.D.3d 862, 898 N.Y.S.2d 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

72 A.D.3d 862 (Cappadora v. Orange-Ulster BOCES) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maddox v. City of New York
487 N.E.2d 553 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Barbato v. Hollow Hills Country Club
14 A.D.3d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Joseph v. New York Racing Ass'n
28 A.D.3d 105 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Lombardo v. Cedar Brook Golf & Tennis Club, Inc.
39 A.D.3d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)