Cappadora v. Berenholtz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cappadora v. Berenholtz

297 A.D.2d 774, 747 N.Y.2d 801, 747 N.Y.S.2d 801, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8945

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2002·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

[775] The defendant failed to establish his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see CPLR 3212 [b]). Therefore, his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied. Ritter, J.P., Smith, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cappadora v. Berenholtz, 297 A.D.2d 774, 747 N.Y.2d 801, 747 N.Y.S.2d 801, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

297 A.D.2d 774 (Cappadora v. Berenholtz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related