Cappadora v. Berenholtz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cappadora v. Berenholtz

297 A.D.2d 774, 747 N.Y.2d 801, 747 N.Y.S.2d 801, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8945

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 297 A.D.2d 774 (Cappadora v. Berenholtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cappadora v. Berenholtz, 297 A.D.2d 774, 747 N.Y.2d 801, 747 N.Y.S.2d 801, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[775]*775The defendant failed to establish his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see CPLR 3212 [b]). Therefore, his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied. Ritter, J.P., Smith, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 A.D.2d 774, 747 N.Y.2d 801, 747 N.Y.S.2d 801, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cappadora-v-berenholtz-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack