Cappadonna v. Passaic Motors, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Cappadonna v. Passaic Motors, Inc.

61 A.2d 282, 137 N.J.L. 661, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 345

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 3, 1948·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The questions are chiefly on the facts, and since there is supporting proof we are bound as to them by the Supreme Court decision. Pitchenick v. New York Folding Box Co., 129 N. J. L. 399; Suburban Land Improvement Co. v. Vailsburgh, 68 Id. 311. In so far as the dispute is of law we affirm, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Bodine filed in the Supreme Court.

The judgment below is affirmed.

For affirmance — Tub Chancellor, Chief Justice, Donges, Colie, Eastwood, Burling, Jacobs, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Scttettino, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The questions are chiefly on the facts, and since there is supporting proof we are bound as to them by the Supreme Court decision. Pitchenick v. New York Folding Box Co., 129 N. J. L. 399; Suburban Land Improvement Co. v. Vailsburgh, 68 Id. 311. In so far as the dispute is of law we affirm, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Bodine filed in the Supreme Court.

The judgment below is affirmed.

For affirmance — Tub Chancellor, Chief Justice, Donges, Colie, Eastwood, Burling, Jacobs, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Scttettino, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Cappadonna v. Passaic Motors, Inc., 61 A.2d 282, 137 N.J.L. 661, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 345 (N.J. 1948).

Pincite

61 A.2d 282 (Cappadonna v. Passaic Motors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related