Cappadonna v. Passaic Motors, Inc.
This text of 61 A.2d 282 (Cappadonna v. Passaic Motors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The questions are chiefly on the facts, and since there is supporting proof we are bound as to them by the Supreme Court decision. Pitchenick v. New York Folding Box Co., 129 N. J. L. 399; Suburban Land Improvement Co. v. Vailsburgh, 68 Id. 311. In so far as the dispute is of law we affirm, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Bodine filed in the Supreme Court.
The judgment below is affirmed.
For affirmance — Tub Chancellor, Chief Justice, Donges, Colie, Eastwood, Burling, Jacobs, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Scttettino, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 A.2d 282, 137 N.J.L. 661, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cappadonna-v-passaic-motors-inc-nj-1948.