Cappa v. Cappa

212 A.D.2d 1056, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1981

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff’s motion for a discontinuance of the divorce action. "[Discontinuance would work particular prejudice against defendant in that it would result in converting what has otherwise been separate property into marital property upon the commencement of any new proceeding” (Ruppert v Ruppert, 192 AD2d 925, 926; see also, Tucker v Tucker, 55 NY2d 378, 383-384; Kane v Kane, 163 AD2d 568, 571). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J.—Discontinue Divorce Action.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cappa v. Cappa, 212 A.D.2d 1056, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1981 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

212 A.D.2d 1056 (Cappa v. Cappa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tucker v. Tucker
434 N.E.2d 1050 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Kane v. Kane
163 A.D.2d 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Ruppert v. Ruppert
192 A.D.2d 925 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)