Capozzi v. State

697 So. 2d 941, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8598, 1997 WL 423427
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 30, 1997·No. No. 96-00548·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In a brief filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), the public defender asserted that this appeal has no arguable merit, with the possible exception of the revocation of probation and the sentence imposed thereafter. Our independent review of the record reveals that the trial court erred in imposing lump sum court costs in the written sentence without citation to statutory authority. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Accordingly, we strike those costs, and remand the case without prejudice to the trial court reimposing costs with proper citation to statutory authority. The judgment and sentences are otherwise affirmed.

Judgment and sentences affirmed, costs stricken, and case remanded with directions.

FRANK, A.C.J., BLUE, J., and RYDER, HERBOTH S., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Capozzi v. State, 697 So. 2d 941, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8598, 1997 WL 423427 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

697 So. 2d 941 (Capozzi v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JODY O'MALLEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Neal v. State
697 So. 2d 941 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)