Capozzi v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
632 A.2d 702, 227 Conn. 925, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 358
Opinion
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 250 (AC 11477), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court correctly held that there was substantial evidence to support the arbitrators’ conclusion that when the plaintiff was injured he was not operating a ‘replacement vehicle’ and that he was therefore not covered by the uninsured motorist provisions of the two insurance policies issued by the defendant?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Capozzi v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance, 632 A.2d 702, 227 Conn. 925, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 358 (Colo. 1993).
632 A.2d 702 (Capozzi v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Capozzi v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
642 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)