Capozzi v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
632 A.2d 702, 227 Conn. 925, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 358
This text of 632 A.2d 702 (Capozzi v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Capozzi v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance, 632 A.2d 702, 227 Conn. 925, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 358 (Colo. 1993).
Opinion
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 250 (AC 11477), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court correctly held that there was substantial evidence to support the arbitrators’ conclusion that when the plaintiff was injured he was not operating a ‘replacement vehicle’ and that he was therefore not covered by the uninsured motorist provisions of the two insurance policies issued by the defendant?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Capozzi v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
642 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
632 A.2d 702, 227 Conn. 925, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capozzi-v-liberty-mutual-fire-insurance-conn-1993.