Capote v. State
758 So. 2d 736, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5802, 2000 WL 628388
This text of 758 So. 2d 736 (Capote v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Capote v. State, 758 So. 2d 736, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5802, 2000 WL 628388 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
Affirmed. Jimenez v. State, 715 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(State may rely upon circumstantial evidence to establish guilt of aider or abettor provided such evidence is both consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence.); Henderson v. State, 679 So.2d 805 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), affirmed, 698 So.2d 1205 (Fla.1997).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Henderson v. State
698 So. 2d 1205 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Henderson v. State
679 So. 2d 805 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Jimenez v. State
715 So. 2d 1038 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
758 So. 2d 736, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5802, 2000 WL 628388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capote-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.