Capote v. State

758 So. 2d 736, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5802, 2000 WL 628388
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 17, 2000·No. No. 3D99-3014·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Jimenez v. State, 715 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(State may rely upon circumstantial evidence to establish guilt of aider or abettor provided such evidence is both consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence.); Henderson v. State, 679 So.2d 805 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), affirmed, 698 So.2d 1205 (Fla.1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Capote v. State, 758 So. 2d 736, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5802, 2000 WL 628388 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

758 So. 2d 736 (Capote v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henderson v. State
698 So. 2d 1205 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Henderson v. State
679 So. 2d 805 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Jimenez v. State
715 So. 2d 1038 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)