Capote v. State
This text of 507 So. 2d 1191 (Capote v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction
Prior to Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986), the trial judge deviated upward from the guidelines on the sole ground that the defendant had been declared a habitual offender under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1985). In response to the brief of appellant, which raises this issue as the sole point on appeal, the state has filed a “motion to relinquish jurisdiction” to the trial court, which we take as a confession of error. Pursuant thereto, the sentence imposed below is reversed on the authority of Whitehead and the cause is remanded for appropriate re-sentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
507 So. 2d 1191, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1380, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capote-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.