Capone v. Sinclair Refining Co.
This text of 262 A.D. 888 (Capone v. Sinclair Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In view of the decision in Capone v. Sinclair Refining Co. (ante, p. 888), decided herewith, the motions for a stay are denied, without costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ. [889]*889Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied, with ten dollars costs, on the merits and because application to Appellate Term for leave to appeal was belated. (Rule VII, Appellate Term, Second Department Rules; Rule XXVI, Appellate Division, Second Department Rules.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D. 888, 29 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capone-v-sinclair-refining-co-nyappdiv-1941.