Capone v. Danaher

13 Conn. Super. Ct. 32
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedJune 24, 1944
DocketFile No. 65008
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Conn. Super. Ct. 32 (Capone v. Danaher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Capone v. Danaher, 13 Conn. Super. Ct. 32 (Colo. Ct. App. 1944).

Opinion

In the finding of facts, the commissioner finds that the claimant "aside from her pregnant condition, has been physically and mentally able to work."

There is no evidence to support the finding that her unemployment was due to pregnancy. That was an excuse used by the employer as a reason for discharging her.

The doctor's certificate indicates that on January 3, 1944, she was able to return to work and though pregnant was not disabled from working.

The last sentence in paragraph 3 of the finding of facts is corrected to read: "During this period the claimant has been physically and mentally able to work and available for work, notwithstanding her pregnancy."

She is accordingly entitled to the benefits under the Act.

The appeal is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Conn. Super. Ct. 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capone-v-danaher-connsuperct-1944.