Capoccia v. Industrial Board of Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Capoccia v. Industrial Board of Appeals

205 A.D.2d 830, 615 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5833

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 830 (Capoccia v. Industrial Board of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Capoccia v. Industrial Board of Appeals, 205 A.D.2d 830, 615 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Industrial Board of Appeals which found that petitioner failed to pay wage supplements.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the conclusion by respondent Industrial Board of Appeals that petitioner was liable for unpaid wage supplements. It was for the Board to resolve any conflicting testimony and evidence before it. Petitioner’s remaining arguments have been reviewed and rejected for lack of merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Industrial Board of Appeals which found that petitioner failed to pay wage supplements.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the conclusion by respondent Industrial Board of Appeals that petitioner was liable for unpaid wage supplements. It was for the Board to resolve any conflicting testimony and evidence before it. Petitioner’s remaining arguments have been reviewed and rejected for lack of merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 830, 615 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capoccia-v-industrial-board-of-appeals-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack