Capoccia v. Appellate Division, Third Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Capoccia v. Appellate Division, Third Department

104 A.D.2d 536, 479 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19960

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 23, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 104 A.D.2d 536 (Capoccia v. Appellate Division, Third Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Capoccia v. Appellate Division, Third Department, 104 A.D.2d 536, 479 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19960 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 for judgment in the nature of prohibition prohibiting this court, and the [537]*537Justices thereof, from taking further action in a pending attorney disciplinary proceeding entitled Matter of Andrew F. Capoccia, Attorney, Respondent, and Committee on Professional Standards, Third Judicial Department, Petitioner, and for other related relief.

Inasmuch as the Justices of this court are named as respondents in this proceeding, the matter may not be adjudicated here (Judiciary Law, § 14) and must be transferred to another court for determination.

Proceeding transferred to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for determination. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Casey and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 for judgment in the nature of prohibition prohibiting this court, and the [537]*537Justices thereof, from taking further action in a pending attorney disciplinary proceeding entitled Matter of Andrew F. Capoccia, Attorney, Respondent, and Committee on Professional Standards, Third Judicial Department, Petitioner, and for other related relief.

Inasmuch as the Justices of this court are named as respondents in this proceeding, the matter may not be adjudicated here (Judiciary Law, § 14) and must be transferred to another court for determination.

Proceeding transferred to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for determination. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Casey and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A.D.2d 536, 479 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capoccia-v-appellate-division-third-department-nyappdiv-1984.