Capoccia Builders v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 81 Ohio St.3d 688.]
CAPOCCIA BUILDERS, APPELLEE, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES; WORTHINGTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF
EDUCATION, APPELLANT. [Cite as Capoccia Builders v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1998-Ohio-344.] Taxation—Real property valuation—Board of Tax Appeals’ decision unreasonable and unlawful, when—“Filing” for purpose of the prohibition of R.C. 5715.19(A)(2) against a second filing in the same interim period, applied. (No. 98-83—Submitted April 21, 1998—Decided May 13, 1998.) APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 96-D-817. __________________ Todd W. Sleggs, for appellee Capoccia Builders. Bricker & Eckler LLP, Charles F. Glander and Mary W. Leslie, for appellant Worthington City School District Board of Education. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Sua sponte, the court finds the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals unreasonable and unlawful and reverses it upon the authority of Elkem Metals Co., L.P. v. Washington Cty. Bd. of Revision (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 683, 693 N.E.2d 276, decided today. Decision reversed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1998 Ohio 344 (Capoccia Builders v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.