Capobianco v. Woo Hsiem

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Capobianco v. Woo Hsiem

249 A.D.2d 353, 670 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4012

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D.2d 353 (Capobianco v. Woo Hsiem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Capobianco v. Woo Hsiem, 249 A.D.2d 353, 670 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the fourth-party defendant Bruno Rossano d/b/a B&R Landscaping, appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), entered May 12, 1997, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the fourth-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondent.

Issues of fact exist as to whether the fourth-party defendant Bruno Rossano d/b/a B&R Landscaping maintained the area where the plaintiff tripped and fell, and, if so, whether he was negligent in so doing (see, Farrar v Teicholz, 173 AD2d 674; Hath v Allied Maintenance Corp., 143 AD2d 634). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the fourth-party defendant Bruno Rossano d/b/a B&R Landscaping, appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), entered May 12, 1997, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the fourth-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondent.

Issues of fact exist as to whether the fourth-party defendant Bruno Rossano d/b/a B&R Landscaping maintained the area where the plaintiff tripped and fell, and, if so, whether he was negligent in so doing (see, Farrar v Teicholz, 173 AD2d 674; Hath v Allied Maintenance Corp., 143 AD2d 634). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 353, 670 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capobianco-v-woo-hsiem-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack