Capmartin v. Police Jury
This text of 70 La. Ann. 448 (Capmartin v. Police Jury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff brought suit against the police jury of the parish of Natchitoches on several obligations, made and signed by the president and clerk thereof, wherein they, the president and clerk, promised that the parish of Natchitoches would pay the amounts stated in the obligations in current funds, and would also receive them in payment of parish dues.
Judgment was rendered against the jury on the obligations, and it has appealed.
The jury relies on various grounds for the reversal of the judgment.
It is only necessary to notice one of the grounds relied on, to wit: that plaintiff had not shown authority in the president and clerk to bind the jury.
There is no law authorizing the president and clerk to bind the jury, nor is there any evidence adduced, showing that it authorized them to make or sign the' obligations sued on.
Let the judgment of the District Court be reversed and annulled, and let the suit of plaintiff be dismissed as of nonsuit, at his cost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 La. Ann. 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capmartin-v-police-jury-la-1867.