Capley v. Clark

California Court of Appeal

Capley v. Clark

112 Cal. App. 427

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 10, 1931

DocketCiv. No. 7873

StatusPublished

This text of 112 Cal. App. 427 (Capley v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Capley v. Clark, 112 Cal. App. 427 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Motion to dismiss appeal.

It appears from the record that on November 4, 1929, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant. No bill of exceptions has since been prepared nor has any transcript been settled under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, and all proceedings for such settlement were terminated and dismissed on the sixth day of February, 1931. The transcript not having been filed within the time prescribed by law, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Motion to dismiss appeal.

It appears from the record that on November 4, 1929, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant. No bill of exceptions has since been prepared nor has any transcript been settled under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, and all proceedings for such settlement were terminated and dismissed on the sixth day of February, 1931. The transcript not having been filed within the time prescribed by law, the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 Cal. App. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capley-v-clark-calctapp-1931.