Caples v. Walker

58 S.W.2d 19
CourtTexas Commission of Appeals
DecidedMarch 15, 1933
DocketMotion No. 10622; No. 1418—6176
StatusPublished

This text of 58 S.W.2d 19 (Caples v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caples v. Walker, 58 S.W.2d 19 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1933).

Opinion

LEDDY, Judge.

Respondent J. H. Walker, land commissioner, has filed a motion in this ease asking that the leave heretofore granted relator to file petition for mandamus be withdrawn and the application dismissed, upon the ground that the land‘upon which relator seeks a mandamus to compel him to issue a mineral lease was patented to M. T. Cole prior to the filing of relator’s petition in the Supreme Court.

The question raised by this motion has been determined in favor of respondent’s contention in W. J. Caples, Relator, v. J. H. Walker, et al., Respondents (Tex. Com. App.) 57 S.W.(2d) 17, this day decided. For the reasons there assigned, the motion must be sustained.

We therefore recommend that respondent’s motion be granted, and that leave to file petition for mandamus heretofore granted relator be withdrawn and the application dismissed.

CURETON, Chief Justice.

Leave to file petition for mandamus is withdrawn, and petition is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 S.W.2d 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caples-v-walker-texcommnapp-1933.