Caple v. Switzer
This text of 81 N.W. 560 (Caple v. Switzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(after stating the facts). Whether the expression in the deeds, “less all that part assigned by the probate court of Gratiot county, Michigan, to Bridget Egan, widow of Patrick Egan, as her dower interest in and to said premises,” excepts the fee of the land, or only the widow’s life estate, may be doubtful. Four months after 'defendants obtained their title, they executed the mortgage, by which they mortgaged the entire land, ‘ ‘ except the life estate of the widow. ” This might fairly be construed as a construction by the defendants of the language of the deeds. But, whether this be so, the mortgage clearly covered the land, subject to the life estate. The title thereto subsequently acquired by the defendants inured to the benefit of the mortgagee and his grantees, under the covenant of warranty contained in it. White v. Smith, 37 Mich. 291; Gray v. Franks, 86 Mich. 382.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 N.W. 560, 122 Mich. 636, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caple-v-switzer-mich-1900.