Caple v. Switzer

81 N.W. 560, 122 Mich. 636, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 625
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 23, 1900·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). Whether the expression in the deeds, “less all that part assigned by the probate court of Gratiot county, Michigan, to Bridget Egan, widow of Patrick Egan, as her dower interest in and to said premises,” excepts the fee of the land, or only the widow’s life estate, may be doubtful. Four months after 'defendants obtained their title, they executed the mortgage, by which they mortgaged the entire land, ‘ ‘ except the life estate of the widow. ” This might fairly be construed as a construction by the defendants of the language of the deeds. But, whether this be so, the mortgage clearly covered the land, subject to the life estate. The title thereto subsequently acquired by the defendants inured to the benefit of the mortgagee and his grantees, under the covenant of warranty contained in it. White v. Smith, 37 Mich. 291; Gray v. Franks, 86 Mich. 382.

Judgment affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caple v. Switzer, 81 N.W. 560, 122 Mich. 636, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 625 (Mich. 1900).

81 N.W. 560 (Caple v. Switzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jacobsen v. Nieboer
299 N.W. 830 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1941)
Florida Land Investment Co. v. Wliliams
84 Fla. 157 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1922)