Caplan v. Neumann
699 So. 2d 1052, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11437, 1997 WL 615868
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 8, 1997
DocketNo. 97-3146
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 699 So. 2d 1052 (Caplan v. Neumann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Caplan v. Neumann, 699 So. 2d 1052, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11437, 1997 WL 615868 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
Opinion
We quash the trial court’s order granting Midfirst Bank’s motion for writ of possession. The writ of possession and certificate of title cannot issue until the trial court resolves Petitioners’ outstanding objection filed timely after the foreclosure sale. See § 45.031(4), Fla. Stat. (1995); Nelson v. Santoro, 570 So.2d 1374 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
ARMANDO A. RIVAS v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Rivas v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon
244 So. 3d 334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Wummer v. Blanton
709 So. 2d 1385 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
699 So. 2d 1052, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11437, 1997 WL 615868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caplan-v-neumann-fladistctapp-1997.