Caplan v. Neumann
699 So. 2d 1052, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11437, 1997 WL 615868
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 8, 1997·No. No. 97-3146·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We quash the trial court’s order granting Midfirst Bank’s motion for writ of possession. The writ of possession and certificate of title cannot issue until the trial court resolves Petitioners’ outstanding objection filed timely after the foreclosure sale. See § 45.031(4), Fla. Stat. (1995); Nelson v. Santoro, 570 So.2d 1374 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caplan v. Neumann, 699 So. 2d 1052, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11437, 1997 WL 615868 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
699 So. 2d 1052 (Caplan v. Neumann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
ARMANDO A. RIVAS v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Rivas v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon
244 So. 3d 334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Wummer v. Blanton
709 So. 2d 1385 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)