Caplan v. Knob

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Caplan v. Knob

199 A.2d 485, 203 Pa. Super. 174, 1964 Pa. Super. LEXIS 827

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 14, 1964·No. Appeal, No. 86·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

This appeal is controlled by our decision in Caplan v. Seidman, 203 Pa. Superior Ct. 170, 199 A. 2d 483. In the instant case, Dale A. Knob was the maker of the note and Simon Seidman, together with Benjamin Caplan, executed the agreement to indemnify the payee against loss. The lower court made absolute a rule to strike off the judgment in its entirety.

The order is affirmed as to the judgment against Simon Seidman and reversed as to the judgment against Dale A. Knob. The court below is directed to reinstate the latter judgment on the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

This appeal is controlled by our decision in Caplan v. Seidman, 203 Pa. Superior Ct. 170, 199 A. 2d 483. In the instant case, Dale A. Knob was the maker of the note and Simon Seidman, together with Benjamin Caplan, executed the agreement to indemnify the payee against loss. The lower court made absolute a rule to strike off the judgment in its entirety.

The order is affirmed as to the judgment against Simon Seidman and reversed as to the judgment against Dale A. Knob. The court below is directed to reinstate the latter judgment on the record.

Caplan v. Knob, 199 A.2d 485, 203 Pa. Super. 174, 1964 Pa. Super. LEXIS 827 (Pa. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

199 A.2d 485 (Caplan v. Knob) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related