Caplan v. Knob
This text of 199 A.2d 485 (Caplan v. Knob) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This appeal is controlled by our decision in Caplan v. Seidman, 203 Pa. Superior Ct. 170, 199 A. 2d 483. In the instant case, Dale A. Knob was the maker of the note and Simon Seidman, together with Benjamin Caplan, executed the agreement to indemnify the payee against loss. The lower court made absolute a rule to strike off the judgment in its entirety.
The order is affirmed as to the judgment against Simon Seidman and reversed as to the judgment against Dale A. Knob. The court below is directed to reinstate the latter judgment on the record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 A.2d 485, 203 Pa. Super. 174, 1964 Pa. Super. LEXIS 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caplan-v-knob-pasuperct-1964.