Caplan v. Commissioner

1957 T.C. Memo. 63, 16 T.C.M. 273, 1957 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 188
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedApril 11, 1957
DocketDocket No. 51108.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1957 T.C. Memo. 63 (Caplan v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caplan v. Commissioner, 1957 T.C. Memo. 63, 16 T.C.M. 273, 1957 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 188 (tax 1957).

Opinion

Salem D. and Sophie Caplan v. Commissioner.
Caplan v. Commissioner
Docket No. 51108.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1957-63; 1957 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 188; 16 T.C.M. (CCH) 273; T.C.M. (RIA) 57063;
April 11, 1957

*188 Held, the sum of $9,200 received by petitioner in 1950 in consideration of the release of his employment contract is taxable as ordinary income, and not as capital gain.

Carman E. Kipp, Esq., for the petitioners. John R. Gauntt, Esq., for the respondent.

LEMIRE

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

The respondent determined a deficiency in income tax of petitioners for the calendar year 1950 in the amount of $968.96.

The sole issue is whether the sum of $9,200 received by petitioners in 1950 from Arthur Caplan and Associates should be taxed as ordinary income or as long-term capital gain.

Findings of Fact

Petitioners are husband and wife who, in 1950, resided in Salt Lake City, Utah. Their joint return for 1950 was*189 filed with the collector of internal revenue for the district of Utah.

In the early part of 1946, Salem D. Caplan, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, entered into a business association with Arthur Caplan, unrelated to petitioner, together with Helen Kaltenbacher, Beatrice R. Harris, Milton Lowy, and Harry Lowy, hereinafter referred to as the Caplan Associates, for the purpose of purchasing and selling war surplus items made available by the Federal Government.

The arrangement between the parties was, in substance, that petitioner, an engineer, would provide his time and services, and the Caplan Associates provide the necessary capital. The profits and losses were to be shared on a basis of one-third by petitioner and two-thirds by Caplan Associates.

Petitioner and the Caplan Associates were successful bidders for the property known as Camp Kearns in Utah which they desired to acquire for the purpose of a housing development.

In July 1948, a corporation known as Kearns Townsite, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the corporation, was formed and all its outstanding capital stock was issued to the Caplan Associates. Petitioner received no stock.

Under date of July 31, 1948, the*190 corporation addressed a letter to petitioner which upon his acceptance was to constitute their mutual agreement. The letter reads in part as follows:

"This will confirm and evidence the understanding that we, the Kearns Town Site, Inc., a corporation, have reached with you in respect to your management and interest in the Camp Kearns project. When signed by each of us it will constitute our mutual agreement.

"The undersigned corporation has purchased Camp Kearns near Salt Lake City, with the intention of developing, improving, selling and liquidating the land, buildings, materials, and other assets included therein. We have already invested the sum of approximately $60,000.00 on the project and will, as the occasions arise, invest further sums. It is impossible at this time to indicate the total investment that may be necessary and we are to be the sole judges as to the amount of money to be invested in the project.

"We desire to employ you as General Manager of the project to which you will devote all of your time and attention, and without the written consent of the corporation, you will not engage in any other enterprise, business or venture, directly or indirectly.

"For*191 your interest and services in and with the project as above stated, you are to receive 25% of all of the profit realized from the Kearns project, which shall be paid as hereinafter provided. You will be allowed as a drawing account against this 25% of the profits the sum of $600.00 per month.

"The term 'profit' as herein used shall be determined according to normal accounting procedure and will be gross income for the fiscal year, less all necessary operating expenses, including Income, Corporation Franchise taxes and all assessments properly chargeable to the project. No deductions shall be made from the gross income in determining the amount of the profits on account of salaries paid to the officers of our corporation, or on account of services rendered by it. If the operations of any one year result in a loss, then one-fourth of the loss shall be accrued as an off-set to the amount accrued in your favor in the years when a profit is realized. This loss shall not obligate you personally, nor be used as an off-set against your salary advances. When your 25% of the net profits is determined the amount, less the $600.00 monthly advanced to you, shall be accrued on the books of the*192 corporation to you. The amount so accrued as being owing to you for your salary shall not become payable until the money owing to the War Assets Administration has been completely paid. * * *

"This agreement shall be for a period of three years from this date and you have the option to renew the term thereof for two successive periods of three years each, provided, however, your death, your inability to discharge the duties as manager on account of physical or mental disability, or the sale and/or liquidations of all of the assets of the project, or a bonafide sale of all of the capital stock of the corporation to an outsider shall terminate this agreement and our respective rights and liabilities hereunder. However, in the event of a sale by the shareholders of the corporation, each of the shareholders will agree on the sale of their capital stock to pay you an amount equal to one-fourth of their gain, less the salary received by you. The corporation agrees to secure the signature of all of the shareholders of the corporation as evidence of their assent to this agreement, and will send you an executed copy of this agreement. In consideration of such payment by the shareholders of*193 the corporation, you will release the corporation of its liability to you on this contract and also from its liability to you as accrued on the books of the corporation, but providing always that the amount that would be so paid to you shall at all times be at least equal to the amount of the accrued liability on the books of the corporation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jessop v. Commissioner
16 T.C. 491 (U.S. Tax Court, 1951)
McFall v. Commissioner
34 B.T.A. 108 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1936)
Gann v. Commissioner
41 B.T.A. 388 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1957 T.C. Memo. 63, 16 T.C.M. 273, 1957 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caplan-v-commissioner-tax-1957.