Caplaco Twelve, Inc. v. Amedi

Missouri Court of Appeals

Caplaco Twelve, Inc. v. Amedi

381 S.W.3d 405, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1307, 2012 WL 4888327

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2012·No. No. ED 98083·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Caplaco Twelve, Inc., d/b/a Chesterfield Village Apartments (“Landlord”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Rewan Amedi (“Tenant”) on its suit for damages to its property.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Caplaco Twelve, Inc., d/b/a Chesterfield Village Apartments (“Landlord”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Rewan Amedi (“Tenant”) on its suit for damages to its property.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Caplaco Twelve, Inc. v. Amedi, 381 S.W.3d 405, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1307, 2012 WL 4888327 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

381 S.W.3d 405 (Caplaco Twelve, Inc. v. Amedi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.