Capitol Packing Co. v. Smith

270 F. Supp. 36, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7642
CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedMay 10, 1967
DocketCiv. A. No. 66-423
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 270 F. Supp. 36 (Capitol Packing Co. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Capitol Packing Co. v. Smith, 270 F. Supp. 36, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7642 (D. Mass. 1967).

Opinion

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.

WYZANSKI, Chief Judge.

1. Capitol Packing Company, a Colorado corporation, filed a complaint against (1) Smith and Kirk, citizens of Connecticut and Massachusetts, who are trustees of the property of the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, a debtor in reorganization, (2) Mt. Vernon Motor Transportation Co., Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, and (3) Consolidated Packing Co., Inc., another Massachusetts corporation. Thereafter Smith' and Kirk, trustees as aforesaid, filed a third-party complaint against The Travelers Indemnity Company, a Connecticut corporation.

2. In the principal action Capitol claimed in count 1 that the trustees of the railroad are liable for the railroad’s delivery of Capitol’s goods covered by an order bill of lading without receipt of that bill, in count 2 that Mt. Vernon is li[37]*37able for not having carefully guarded the goods, and in count 3 that Consolidated is liable for the beef which it bought and of which it received delivery. Subsequently Capitol amended its complaint so that count 1 alleged that the trustees of the railroad are liable under 49 U.S.C. § 20(11). In the third party action the railroad trustees complained that The Travelers Indemnity Company is liable on a bond for all sums that Capitol may recover from the railroad trustees.

3. October 14 or 15, 1965, Consolidated by telephone agreed to buy from Capitol 235 hind quarters of fresh beef. In accordance with their earlier dealings, the parties impliedly agreed that Capitol would ship the meat on an order-notify bill of lading; that Capitol, through appropriate banking channels, would transmit to Consolidated the original bill together with a draft for the purchase price drawn upon Consolidated; and that Consolidated would pay such draft. The parties expressly agreed that the meat would be shipped “piggy back”, that is, not in a conventional closed freight car but in a trailer box transferrable from a trailer vehicle drawn by a truck to a railroad flat top freight car and thence to a trailer vehicle drawn by a truck. The parties impliedly agreed that Capitol would prepay the freight from its place of business to the Boston railroad ramp of the N. Y., N. H. & H. R. Co., and that upon arrival of the shipment in Boston the railroad would notify Consolidated. Consolidated expressly stated that it would use Mt. Vernon to pick up the shipment. Capitol had had no contract or understanding or relation of any kind with Mt. Vernon. Nor did Capitol ever expressly or impliedly agree that it would bear the cost of, or be concerned with, carriage from the Boston railroad ramp or terminal to Consolidated’s platform or premises. It merely gave Consolidated a choice as to whether the beef would be delivered at the Boston railroad compound in a conventional freight car or in a trailer box transferrable from a railroad flat car to a truck.

4. October 20, 1965 Capitol shipped 235 fresh beef hinds having a value of $16,414.40 by delivering them to Curtis, Inc., a common carrier by motor vehicle, for it to carry the shipment from Denver to Chicago, and there to transfer it to the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad Company for carriage by it and the N. Y., N. H. & H. R. Co. from Chicago to Boston. Curtis, Inc., placed the 235 hinds in what is called “Curtis Box 907.” To cover this shipment in Curtis Box 907, Capitol’s agent and an agent acting for both Curtis and E.L.R. Co. executed an order-notify bill of lading upon a uniform domestic order of bill of lading form adopted by carriers in Official, Southern, Western and Illinois Classification territories.

5. On its face the bill recited that “The surrender of this Original ORDER Bill of Lading properly indorsed shall be required before the delivery of the property.” That bill names Curtis, Inc. and Erie-Lackawanna as the receiving parties, and Capitol as shipper and as consignee. The bill then recites that the destination is “Boston”, that the carrier is to “Notify Consolidated Packing Co.”; that the “Route” is “CURTIS TO CHICAGO, EL NY NH-H TOFO PLAN 2-% % MT. VERNON TRANS.”; and that the freight is “to be prepaid.”

6. The obverse of the bill sets forth in fine print certain contract terms and conditions. Here it is sufficient to refer to section 2(b) thereof which requires “As a condition precedent to recovery, claims must be filed in writing with the receiving or delivering carrier * * * within nine months after delivery of the property.”

7. This Court finds as ultimate facts and concludes as a matter of law that—

(a) The destination “Boston” stated in the bill means the Boston railroad ramp of the N. Y., N. H. & H. R. Co.

(b) The route covered by the bill of lading is by Curtis, Inc. from Denver to Chicago and by Erie-Lackawanna and N. Y., N.H. & H.R. Co. from Chicago to Boston.

[38]*38(c) The letters “TOFC” mean “trailer on freight car.”

(d) "PLAN 2-1/2” means that the carriage covered by the bill of lading is that type of piggy-back transportation in which the railroad carriers perform only the carriage from one railroad ramp to another railroad ramp, and do not furnish either pick-up or delivery service, but such service is performed by some third party.

(e) % means “care of”.

(f) In its entirety the bill of lading covers carriage only from Denver to the Boston railroad ramp of the N. Y., N. H. & H. R. Co. The reference to Mt. Vernon has no significance except to inform the N. Y., N. H. & H. R. Co. that after it has notified Consolidated of the arrival of the shipment, Consolidated’s agent to pick-up the trailer box will be Mt. Vernon. See Commonwealth v. People’s Express Co., 201 Mass. 564, 572, 88 N.E. 420.

(g) Under the bill of lading and under the agreement between Consolidated and Capitol, Mt. Vernon was to act not as a common carrier or as an agent for Capitol but solely as a contract carrier for Consolidated.

8. Capitol paid the freight from Denver to the Boston railroad ramp.

9. November 1, 1965 the beef shipment arrived at the Boston ramp of the N. Y., N. H. & H. R. Co. The railroad promptly notified Consolidated.

10. The same day Consolidated called Mt. Vernon and authorized it to act for Consolidated in picking up and accepting delivery of this beef shipment, which had been carried in “Curtis Box 907”, and also another shipment carried in “Curtis Box 508.”

11. Previously, Consolidated had arranged with the N. Y., N. H. & H. R. Co. and The Travelers Indemnity Company for the delivery to Consolidated of property covered by order bills of lading without the production of such bills. The original agreement was made August 13, 1962 and was renewed January 19, 1964. The 1962 agreement was set forth in a blanket bond, executed by Consolidated as principal and Travelers as surety, and naming as creditor or obligee the N.Y., N. H. & H. R. Co. The 1964 agreement took the form of a rider to the original bond. It continued the earlier bond but for a larger amount and for a longer period. Otherwise the agreement remained unchanged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reading Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
64 Pa. D. & C.2d 476 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 F. Supp. 36, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capitol-packing-co-v-smith-mad-1967.