Capitol House Preservation Co. v. Perryman Consultants, Inc.
Opinions
This appeal challenges the trial court’s granting of the defendants’ exceptions of res judicata. The briefs and issues raised therein are identical to those raised in Capitol House Preservation Company, L.L.C. v. Perryman Consultants, Inc., 03-1983 (La.App. 1 Cir. 11/3/04), 889 So.2d 304, 2004 WL 2452826 also handed down this day. For the reasons stated therein, we affirm the judgment appealed from. All costs of this appeal are assessed to appellant.
AFFIRMED.
KUHN, J., concurs.
PARRO, J., dissents and assigns reasons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
889 So. 2d 312 (Capitol House Preservation Co. v. Perryman Consultants, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.