Capitol Center Corp. v. Beggs

386 F.2d 840
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 13, 1967·No. No. 17749·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This court having received and considered briefs and oral arguments in the above-styled case; and

Having read and considered the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States District Judge dated November 2, 1966; and

Having reviewed the testimonial record of the trial,

Hereby determines that said findings of fact are not clearly erroneous (See Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); United States v. Yellow Cab Co., 338 U.S. 338, 70 S.Ct. 177, 94 L.Ed. 150 (1949); In re Van Sweringen Corp., 155 F.2d 1009 (6th Cir. 1946)), and said conclusions of law (excepting only paragraph (9), which appears irrelevant to this litigation) are well founded; and

That the judgment of the United States District Court, entered November 28, 1966, should be and is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Capitol Center Corp. v. Beggs, 386 F.2d 840 (6th Cir. 1967).

386 F.2d 840 (Capitol Center Corp. v. Beggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Capitol Center Corporation v. Beggs
386 F.2d 840 (Sixth Circuit, 1967)