Capitani v. Astrue

438 F. App'x 605
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 17, 2011·No. No. 09-57015·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM***

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Capitani’s attorney’s late-filed application for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act because her reasons for missing the deadline amounted to “a garden variety claim of excusable neglect.” Irwin v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. 89, 96, 111 S.Ct. 453, 112 L.Ed.2d 435 (1990); see Le v. Astrue, 529 F.3d 1200, 1201 (9th Cir.2008); see also Modrowski v. Mote, 322 F.3d 965, 968-69 (7th Cir.2003).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Capitani v. Astrue, 438 F. App'x 605 (9th Cir. 2011).

438 F. App'x 605 (Capitani v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs
498 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1991)
Paul Modrowski v. Stephen D. Mote
322 F.3d 965 (Seventh Circuit, 2003)
Minh Q. Le v. Astrue
529 F.3d 1200 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)