Capitani v. Astrue
438 F. App'x 605
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Capitani’s attorney’s late-filed application for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act because her reasons for missing the deadline amounted to “a garden variety claim of excusable neglect.” Irwin v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. 89, 96, 111 S.Ct. 453, 112 L.Ed.2d 435 (1990); see Le v. Astrue, 529 F.3d 1200, 1201 (9th Cir.2008); see also Modrowski v. Mote, 322 F.3d 965, 968-69 (7th Cir.2003).
AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Capitani v. Astrue, 438 F. App'x 605 (9th Cir. 2011).
438 F. App'x 605 (Capitani v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs
498 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1991)
Paul Modrowski v. Stephen D. Mote
322 F.3d 965 (Seventh Circuit, 2003)
Minh Q. Le v. Astrue
529 F.3d 1200 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)