Capital Transit Co. v. Platshon

202 F.2d 368, 92 U.S. App. D.C. 108

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee has recovered judgment against appellant for personal injuries. Appellant contends the evidence of negligence was not sufficient. Though it seems to us, from the printed record, that this evidence was not strong and was strongly rebutted, we cannot say it was not substantial or that the jury which saw and heard the witnesses could not reasonably believe it. Accordingly we think the court was right in submitting the question of negligence to the jury. We have considered appellant’s other contentions and find no error.

Affirmed.