Capital Transit Co. v. Davis
209 F.2d 818, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 339
Opinion
In this personal injury case there was sharply conflicting testimony on vital points. We think the judge did not err [819]*819in submitting the case to the jury or in his instructions to the jury.
Affirmed.
WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge, dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Capital Transit Co. v. Davis, 209 F.2d 818, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 339 (D.C. Cir. 1954).
209 F.2d 818 (Capital Transit Co. v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.