Capital Transit Co. v. Davis

209 F.2d 818, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 339
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 28, 1954·No. No. 11879·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this personal injury case there was sharply conflicting testimony on vital points. We think the judge did not err [819]*819in submitting the case to the jury or in his instructions to the jury.

Affirmed.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Capital Transit Co. v. Davis, 209 F.2d 818, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 339 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

209 F.2d 818 (Capital Transit Co. v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.