Capital Transit Co. v. Davis
This text of 209 F.2d 818 (Capital Transit Co. v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
209 F.2d 818
CAPITAL TRANSIT CO.
v.
DAVIS.
No. 11879.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued January 19, 1954.
Decided January 28, 1954.
Mr. Frank F. Roberson, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Mr. J. E. Bindeman, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In this personal injury case there was sharply conflicting testimony on vital points. We think the judge did not err in submitting the case to the jury or in his instructions to the jury.
Affirmed.
WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge, dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 F.2d 818, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 339, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capital-transit-co-v-davis-cadc-1954.