Capital Transit Co. v. Davis

209 F.2d 818, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 339, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3676
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 28, 1954
Docket19-1019
StatusPublished

This text of 209 F.2d 818 (Capital Transit Co. v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Capital Transit Co. v. Davis, 209 F.2d 818, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 339, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3676 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

Opinion

209 F.2d 818

CAPITAL TRANSIT CO.
v.
DAVIS.

No. 11879.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued January 19, 1954.

Decided January 28, 1954.

Mr. Frank F. Roberson, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Mr. J. E. Bindeman, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this personal injury case there was sharply conflicting testimony on vital points. We think the judge did not err in submitting the case to the jury or in his instructions to the jury.

Affirmed.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 F.2d 818, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 339, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capital-transit-co-v-davis-cadc-1954.