Capital Sunbelt Investments, Inc. v. Oberlin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Capital Sunbelt Investments, Inc. v. Oberlin

524 So. 2d 1143, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1157, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1955, 1988 WL 45889

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 13, 1988

DocketNo. 87-2332

StatusPublished

This text of 524 So. 2d 1143 (Capital Sunbelt Investments, Inc. v. Oberlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Capital Sunbelt Investments, Inc. v. Oberlin, 524 So. 2d 1143, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1157, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1955, 1988 WL 45889 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record in this case and the arguments of the parties, we conclude that the trial judge properly granted the equitable relief which he found appropriate after the nonjury trial. Since all of the limited partners and the general partner of the limited partnership were parties to the suit, the trial judge had jurisdiction to grant the relief contained in the final judgment. Under such circumstances, the final judgment was properly entered even though the limited partnership itself was not a party. We view the trial judge’s declaration that the limited partnership is nonexistent to be unnecessary for the implementation of the remedies contained in the final judgment.

Accordingly, we affirm.

DANAHY, C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record in this case and the arguments of the parties, we conclude that the trial judge properly granted the equitable relief which he found appropriate after the nonjury trial. Since all of the limited partners and the general partner of the limited partnership were parties to the suit, the trial judge had jurisdiction to grant the relief contained in the final judgment. Under such circumstances, the final judgment was properly entered even though the limited partnership itself was not a party. We view the trial judge’s declaration that the limited partnership is nonexistent to be unnecessary for the implementation of the remedies contained in the final judgment.

Accordingly, we affirm.

DANAHY, C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

524 So. 2d 1143, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1157, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1955, 1988 WL 45889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capital-sunbelt-investments-inc-v-oberlin-fladistctapp-1988.