Capital Outdoor Advertising v. City of Raleigh
430 S.E.2d 424, 333 N.C. 789
Opinion
Motion by plaintiffs to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 3 June 1993. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 June 1993.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Capital Outdoor Advertising v. City of Raleigh, 430 S.E.2d 424, 333 N.C. 789 (N.C. 1993).
430 S.E.2d 424 (Capital Outdoor Advertising v. City of Raleigh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Asheville v. Woodberry Associates, Ltd.
442 S.E.2d 328 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1994)