Capital Newspapers, Division of Hearst Corp. v. Whalen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Capital Newspapers, Division of Hearst Corp. v. Whalen

120 A.D.2d 919, 502 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57003

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 29, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.2d 919 (Capital Newspapers, Division of Hearst Corp. v. Whalen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Capital Newspapers, Division of Hearst Corp. v. Whalen, 120 A.D.2d 919, 502 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57003 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did this court err, as a matter of law, in modifying Special Term’s judgment by reversing so much thereof as required disclosure of the papers of the late Erastus Corning, II, for the years 1980-1983 relating solely to his personal activities and those made or received in his capacity as Chairman of the Albany County Democratic Committee, remitting the matter to Special Term for further proceedings, and, as so modified, affirming the judgment?” Kane, J. P., Casey, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did this court err, as a matter of law, in modifying Special Term’s judgment by reversing so much thereof as required disclosure of the papers of the late Erastus Corning, II, for the years 1980-1983 relating solely to his personal activities and those made or received in his capacity as Chairman of the Albany County Democratic Committee, remitting the matter to Special Term for further proceedings, and, as so modified, affirming the judgment?” Kane, J. P., Casey, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.2d 919, 502 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capital-newspapers-division-of-hearst-corp-v-whalen-nyappdiv-1986.