Capital National Bank v. Reliance Life Insurance

157 S.E. 128, 42 Ga. App. 678, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 103
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 17, 1931
Docket20411
StatusPublished

This text of 157 S.E. 128 (Capital National Bank v. Reliance Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Capital National Bank v. Reliance Life Insurance, 157 S.E. 128, 42 Ga. App. 678, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 103 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. In the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, all of which (except those assigning error upon the direction of the verdict) are based on alleged errors in admitting evidence, we find no error that requires the grant of a new trial.

2. The evidence introduced, with all reasonable inferences and deductions therefrom, demanded a verdict for the defendant, and the court did not err in so directing.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 S.E. 128, 42 Ga. App. 678, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capital-national-bank-v-reliance-life-insurance-gactapp-1931.