Capital Holding Co. v. Stavrolakes
707 N.E.2d 432, 92 N.Y.2d 1009, 684 N.Y.S.2d 477, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 4352
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (242 AD2d 240). Certified question not answered as unnecessary.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Capital Holding Co. v. Stavrolakes, 707 N.E.2d 432, 92 N.Y.2d 1009, 684 N.Y.S.2d 477, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 4352 (N.Y. 1998).
707 N.E.2d 432 (Capital Holding Co. v. Stavrolakes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barrett Japaning, Inc. v. Bialobroda
68 A.D.3d 474 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Roxborough Apartments Corp. v. Becker
187 Misc. 2d 604 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Roxborough Apartment Corp. v. Becker
183 Misc. 2d 744 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1999)